点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:333
2022年第3期   DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2021.612
“超越精明收缩”的乡村规划转型与治理创新——国际经验与本土化建构
Rural Planning Transformation and Governance Innovation from the Perspective of “Beyond Smart Shrinkage”: International Experience and Local Exploration

胡航军 张京祥

Hu Hangjun, Zhang Jingxiang

关键词:乡村收缩;国际经验;精明收缩;乡村治理;村庄规划;可持续发展

Keywords:Rural Shrinkage; International Experience; Smart Shrinkage; Rural Governance; Village Planning; Sustainable Development

摘要:

随着经济社会的巨大发展与城镇化的快速推进,传统的乡土中国正在逐步瓦解,引发了以人口收缩为主要表征的乡村收缩问题。 本文在解读中国乡村收缩总体特征的基础上,辨析了国内相关研究的内涵,认为当前的收缩乡村实践存在消极抵制收缩与过分聚焦空间的误区。通过梳理国际普遍的态度演进与应对之策,认为国土空间规划体系下的村庄规划需要超越狭义关注空间的精明收缩理念,在立足中国独特机制的基础上,从发展范式转变、规划体系转型、治理模式创新等多方面的探索来匹配现实的收缩趋势,最终促进乡村地区的治理现代化与可持续发展。

Abstract:

With the tremendous economic and social development and the rapid advancement of urbanization, the traditional rural China is falling apart, triggering the problem of rural shrinkage mainly characterized by population decline. Based on interpreting the overall characteristics of rural shrinkage in China, this paper analyzes the connotation of relevant domestic research, and believes that the current practice in shrinking rural areas has the misunderstanding of passive resistance to shrinkage and over focusing on space. By summarizing the evolution of general international attitudes and countermeasures, it is believed that the villages planning under spatial planning system needs to go beyond the confined meaning of smart shrinkage that focuses on space in a narrow sense, and based on the unique mechanism, to match the actual shrinking trend by exploring in many ways such as development paradigm transformation, planning system transformation, governance model innovation, etc. and ultimately to promote the modernization of governance and sustainable development in rural areas.

版权信息:
基金项目:
作者简介:

胡航军,南京大学建筑与城市规划学院硕士研究生。 863213139@qq.com 

张京祥(通信作者),博士,南京大学建筑与城市规划学院教授、 博士生导师,中国城市规划学会常务理事,中国城市规划学会城乡治理与政策研究学术委员会主任委员。3593786@163.com

译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] 本刊编辑部. 新型城镇化座谈会发言摘要 [J]. 城市规划学刊 , 2014(1): 1-8. 

    [2] 赵民, 游猎, 陈晨. 论农村人居空间的“精明收缩”导向和规划策略[J]. 城市规划 , 2015(7): 9-18. 

    [3] 谢正伟 , 李和平. 论乡村的“精明收缩”及其实现路径 [C] // 城乡治理与规划改革——2014 中国城市规划年会论文集(14 小城镇与农村规划). 中国建筑工业出版社 , 2014: 10. 

    [4] 罗震东 , 周洋岑 . 精明收缩:乡村规划建设转型的一种认知 [J]. 乡村规划建设 , 2016(1): 30-38. 

    [5] 张京祥 , 张尚武 , 段德罡 , 等 .  多规合一的实用性村庄规划[J]. 城市规划 , 2020(3): 74-83. 

    [6] HOSPERS G. Coping with shrinkage in Europe’s cities and towns[J]. Urban design international, 2013(1): 78-89. 

    [7] 张京祥 , 陈浩 . 中国的“压缩”城市化环境与规划应对 [J]. 城市规划学刊 , 2010(6): 10-21. 

    [8] 费孝通 . 乡土中国 [M]. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店, 1985.

    [9] 焦林申 , 张敏 . 收缩乡村的空废成因与精明收缩规划策略——基于豫东典型乡村的田野调查 [J]. 经济地理 , 2021(4): 221-232. 

    [10] 赵毅 , 张飞 , 李瑞勤 . 快速城镇化地区乡村振兴路径探析——以江苏苏南地区为例 [J]. 城市规划学刊 , 2018(2): 98-105. 

    [11] 吴亚伟 , 张超荣 , 江帆 , 等 . 实施乡村振兴战略创新县域乡村建设规划编制——以《安徽省广德县县域乡村建设规划》为例 [J]. 小城镇建设 , 2017(12): 16-23. 

    [12] 黄鹤 . 精明收缩:应对城市衰退的规划策略及其在美国的实践 [J]. 城市与区域规划研究 , 2011(3): 157-168. 

    [13] POPPER D E, POPPER F J. Small can be beautiful [J]. Planning, 2002(7): 20.

    [14] 王雨村 , 王影影 , 屠黄桔 . 精明收缩理论视角下苏南乡村空间发展策略 [J]. 规划师 , 2017(1): 39-44. 

    [15] 杨念慈 . 基于精明收缩的农村居民点空间布局优化研究 [D]. 长沙 : 湖南师范大学 , 2017. 

    [16] 李星星 . 人口收缩背景下湖南省县域村镇公共服务设施规划研究 [D]. 长沙 : 湖南大学 , 2017. 

    [17] 周洋岑 , 罗震东 , 耿磊 . 基于“精明收缩”的山地乡村居民点集聚规划——以湖北省宜昌市龙泉镇为例 [J]. 规划师 , 2016(6): 86-91. 

    [18] 房艳刚 . 乡村规划 :管理乡村变化的挑战 [J]. 城市规划 , 2017(2): 85-93. 

    [19] 何光环 , 唐古拉 , 李本智 . 国土空间规划背景下的城市近郊村庄精明收缩规划实践探索——以宁波市永旺村为例 [J]. 小城镇建设 , 2021(1): 83-90. 

    [20] 章昌平 , 米加宁 , 黄欣卓 , 等 . 收缩的挑战:扩张型社会的终结还是调适的开始?[J]. 公共管理学报 , 2018(4): 1-16. 

    [21] 张京祥 , 申明锐 , 赵晨 . 乡村复兴:生产主义和后生产主义下的中国乡村转型 [J]. 国际城市规划 , 2014(5): 1-7. 

    [22] WHITELAW G H. Japan’s shrinking regions in the 21st century: contemporary responses to depopulation and socioeconomic decline[J]. Social science Japan journal, 2015(2): 279-282. 

    [23] HASHIMOTO A, TELFER D J, TELFER S. Life beyond growth? rural depopulation becoming the attraction in Nagoro, Japan’s scarecrow village[J]. Journal of heritage tourism, 2020: 1-20. 

    [24] FELDHOFF T. Shrinking communities in Japan: community ownership of assets as a development potential for rural Japan?[J]. Urban design international, 2013(1): 99-109. 

    [25] BEETZ S, HUNING S, PLIENINGER T. Landscapes of peripherization in north-eastern Germany’s countryside: new challenges for planning theory and practice[J]. International planning studies, 2008(4): 295-310. 

    [26] BEETZ S, NEU C. From business development to quality of life: innovation in rural north-east Germany[J]. Outlook on agriculture, 2006(2): 137-142. 

    [27] HOSPERS G, REVERDA N. Managing population decline in Europe’s urban and rural areas[M]. Springer, 2014. 

    [28] MCMORRAN R, ATTERTON J, JONES S J. International case studies on demographic change in remote rural areas: what can Scotland learn from elsewhere?[EB/OL]. (2019-03-28)[2021-08-08]. https://pure.sruc.ac.uk/en/ publications/international-case-studies-on-demographic-change-in-remote-rural-. 

    [29] KüPPER P, KUNDOLF S, METTENBERGER T, et al. Rural regeneration strategies for declining regions: trade-off between novelty and practicability[J]. European planning studies, 2018(2): 229-255. 

    [30] RAY C. The EU LEADER programme: rural development laboratory[J]. Sociologia ruralis, 2000(2): 163-171. 

    [31] DAX T, STRAHL W, KIRWAN J, et al. The LEADER programme 2007-2013: enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? insights from Austria and Ireland[J]. European urban and regional studies, 2016(1): 56-68.

    [32] SOUSA S, PINHO P. Planning for shrinkage: paradox or paradigm[J]. European planning studies, 2015(1): 12-32.

    [33] DAX T, FISCHER M. An alternative policy approach to rural development in regions facing population decline[J]. European planning studies, 2018(2): 297-315. 

    [34] SYSSNER J, MEIJER M. Informal planning in depopulating rural areas: a resource-based view on informal planning practices[J]. European countryside, 2017(3): 458-472. 

    [35] MEIJER M, ERNSTE H. Broadening the scope of spatial planning: making a case for informality in the Netherlands[J]. Journal of planning education and research, 2019: 739456X-19826211X. 

    [36] KOYANAGI S. Promoting in-migration and resettlement in peripheral regions of Japan - background, conditions, and challenges: case study of Kyushu region[J]. Journal of geography-Chigaku Zasshi, 2016(4): 507-522. 

    [37] MATANLE P, SATO Y. Coming soon to a city near you! Learning to live ‘beyond growth’ in Japan’s shrinking regions[J]. Social science Japan journal, 2010(2): 187-210. 

    [38] LOWNDES V, PRATCHETT L, STOKER G. Diagnosing and remedying the failings of official participation schemes: the CLEAR framework[J]. Social policy and society, 2006(2): 281-291. 

    [39] MEIJER M. When it goes wrong… learning from challenged (and revived) community initiatives[J]. Journal of rural studies, 2020: 1-9.

《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7793660