翁超 庄宇

Weng Chao, Zhuang Yu

关键词：容积率银行；城市更新；运作模式；比较分析；城市设计；公共政策； 发展权转移；高密度城市发展

Keywords：FAR Bank; Urban Renewal; Operation Mode; Comparative Analysis; Urban Design; Public Policy; Transfer of Development Rights; High Density Urban Development

摘要：

容积率银行作为发展权转移制度的辅助技术，可在城市更新的过程中调节市场时间差，储存未利用的容积率，为发展权交易提供信息平台，大大提高了发展权转移项目的成功率，促进了城市更新项目的顺利实施。对于美国容积率银行的研究可为我国城市更新过程中结合市场机制的调控技术探索提供参考。本文解析了容积率银行的定义以及内涵、职能和权利、发展历程等，并通过纽约和西雅图的容积率银行应用案例的比较分析，梳理出容积率银行针对不同尺度城市更新项目的运作模式及其成效。纽约以南街海港特别区为代表，在城市设计的尺度上应用容积率银行；西雅图则以整个城市为单位进行调控。两个案例中的容积率银行均有效平衡了地方政府、开发商和公众的利益，最终保护了历史资产，促进了城市基础设施建设，并通过引入新的激励手段推进了城市更新进程。

Abstract：

FAR banks were originally created to counter some of the difficulties posed by the use of Transfer of Development Rights （TDR） technique. In the urban renewal process, FAR banks fill the timing gap of the market, act as a clearing house and information platform, and help a lot with TDR transactions. Study on the operation mode of FAR bank in United States provides references for China in exploring the incentive zoning method in urban renewal programs. Through the study of definition, function and development history of FAR bank, by using comparative analysis of FAR bank in both New York City and Seattle, this paper tries to sort out the operation mode and application result of FAR bank in different urban scales. While Seattle FAR bank deals with urban renewal program on the cityscale, FAR bank in New York City tries to tackle the issue in the district context, especially in Special South Street Seaport District. Both of them make a great contribution to the historic assets preservation and public facility construction, at the same time, they promotee urban renewal process by introducing new stimulating interests to the city.

翁超，同济大学建筑与城市规划学院，博士生。wengchaooo@hotmail.com

庄宇，同济大学建筑与城市规划学院建筑系，教授，博士生导师；同济大学城市更新与设计学科，团队主持

• [1] BARNETT J. Urban design as public policy: practical methods for improving cities[M]. Architectural Record Books, 1974.

  [2] STEINER F, BUTLER K, American Planning Association. Planning and urban design standards[M]. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2007.

  [3] 陈佳骊. 美国新泽西州土地发展权转移银行的运作模式及其启示[J]. 中国土地科学, 2011, 25(5): 85-90.

  [4] 洪霞, 郭磊. 美国土地开发权转让政策浅析——以华盛顿州金县为例[C]. 持续发展 理性规划——2017 中国城市规划年会论文集(14 规划实施与管理), 北京: 中国城市规划学会, 2017.

  [5] 戴锏. 美国容积率调控技术的体系化演变及应用研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2010.

  [6] NORLING J. Transferable development rights mitigation banking[C] // Transferable Development Seminar. Queensland Environmental Law Association, 2001.

  [7] Situ Studio. Uneven growth: tactical urbanisms for expanding mega cities[R]. New York City: New Brooklyn Digital Foundry, 2014.

  [8] KAPLOWITZ M D, MACHEMER P, PRUETZ R. Planners' experiences in managing growth using transferable development rights (TDR) in the United States[J]. Land use policy, 2008, 25(3): 378-387.

  [9] FULTON W. TDRs and other market-based land mechanisms: how they work and their role in shaping metropolitan growth[R]. The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Meropolitan Policy, 2004.

  [10] BRINKLEY M H. Where is TDR working and how would we know: results from a nationwide study of TDR program components and outcomes[D]. East Lansing: Michigan State University, 2007.

  [11] NELSON A C, PRUETZ R, WOODRUFF D, et al. The TDR handbook: designing and implementing successful transfer of development rights programs[M]. Washington: Island Press, 2011.

  [12] City Planning Commission, The City of New York. Zoning resolution: 91-60 regulations for the South Street Seaport Subdistrict[S/OL]. (2011-02-02)[2021-04-19]. https://zr.planning.nyc.gov/article-ix/chapter-1#91-60.

  [13] Department of City Planning. A survey of transferable development rights mechanisms in New York City[R]. New York City: Department of City Planning, 2015.

  [14] STEVENSON S J. Banking on TDRS: the government's role as banker of transferable development rights[J]. New York University law review, 1998, 73(4): 1329-1376.

  [15] City of Seattle. Seattle TDR Map[DB/OL]. (2016)[2021-04-19]. https://data.seattle.gov/dataset/TDR-Map/h2ae-fhe9.

  
  

• 收起