点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:69
2023年第3期   DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2020.643
私有公共空间与空间正义之博弈——以香港为例
The Interplay Between Privately-owned Public Space and Spatial Justice: The Case of Hong Kong

简祎 罗洁梅 王安琪 陈汉云 陈蔚镇 邵健伟

Jian Yi, Luo Jiemei, Wang Anqi, Hon Wan Edwin Chan, Chen Weizhen, Kin Wai Michael Siu

关键词:私有公共空间;空间正义;可达性;社会包容;公共性;多样性

Keywords:Privately-owned Public Space; Spatial Justice; Accessibility; Social Inclusion; Publicness; Diversity

摘要:

私有公共空间作为增加城市公共空间存量、提升空间品质、激发城市活力的策略已日渐普遍。然而,私有公共空间被质疑是迎合了当下绅士化审美趋势的产物,是商业资本用以实现社会控制的排他性空间,引发了业界对空间不公的讨论。本研究通过梳理空间正义的相关理论,以香港商业公共空间为实证研究对象,探讨私有公共空间中空间正义的表达。从活动多样性、安全性与管理、邻近与可步行性、公共性和公众参与五个方面剖析其中公私权力的界限,理解私人所有权与空间正义间的冲突性生产关系和微妙的阈限性。挖掘私有公共空间在空间正义语境下作为缓解城市不公的中介效益,有助于实现公共空间的优化配置,缓解社会不公平现象。


Abstract:

Privately-owned public spaces (POPS) have emerged as a common strategy to increase the stock of urban public space, improve spatial quality, and stimulate urban vitality. However, POPS have been criticised for being a product of the current gentrified aesthetic trend and as an exclusive space manipulated by commercial capital to achieve social control, leading to the discussion of spatial (in)justice. This paper explores the spatial justice performance in POPS from five dimensions, namely diversity of activities, security and management, proximity and walkability, publicness, and public participation. Through examining the subtle interplay and liminality between private ownership and spatial justice, this paper aims to shed light on how POPS can function as a mediator to moderate urban injustice. The results have important implications for urban policy and design, including achieving optimal allocation of public space and alleviating social inequality.


版权信息:
基金项目:香港理工大学博士后科研项目1-W19P 及严志明励学教授席(Eric C. Yim Endowed Professorship)科研基金的阶段性成果,国家自然科学基金面上项目(52078447)
作者简介:

简祎,博士,香港理工大学设计学院,博士后。izzy-yi.jian@polyu.edu.hk

罗洁梅,香港理工大学、同济大学,双学位博士研究生。jiemei.luo@connect.polyu.hk

王安琪,博士,浙江工业大学设计与建筑学院城乡规划系,讲师。wanganqi@zjut.edu.cn

陈汉云,博士,香港理工大学建筑及房地产学系,教授。edwin.chan@polyu.edu.hk

陈蔚镇,博士,同济大学建筑与城市规划学院景观学系,教授。ann_1101@163.com

邵健伟(通信作者),博士,香港理工大学设计学院,公共设计学讲座教授,公共设计研究室主任。m.siu@polyu.edu.hk

译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] KAYDEN J S. Privately owned public space: the New York City experience[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.

    [2] 于洋. 纽约市区划条例的百年流变(1916—2016)——以私有公共空间建设为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016, 31(2): 98-109.

    [3] ZUKIN S. Landscapes of power: from Detroit to Disney World[M]. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1991.

    [4] JIAN I Y, LUO J, CHAN E H W. Spatial justice in public open space planning: accessibility and inclusivity[J]. Habitat international, 2020: 102122.

    [5] JIAN I Y, CHAN E H W, XU Y, et al. Inclusive public open space for all: spatial justice with health considerations[J]. Habitat international, 2021, 118: 102457.

    [6] DEBORD G. Society of the spectacle[M]. Detroit: Black & Red, 1983.

    [7] 约翰·罗尔斯. 正义论(初版)[M]. 台湾: 桂冠园书股份有限公司, 2003.

    [8] HARVEY D. Social justice and the city[M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1973.

    [9] YOUNG I M. Justice and the politics of difference[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.

    [10] 周恺, 董丹梨, 潘兰英. 城市的正义:西方“社会公正”思想的意识形态根源[J]. 国际城市规划, 2019, 34(3): 78-86. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2018.166.

    [11] 李建华, 袁超. 论城市空间正义[J]. 中州学刊, 2014(1): 106-111.

    [12] FAINSTEIN S S. The just city[J]. International journal of urban sciences, 2014. 18(1): 1-18.

    [13] SOJA E W. Seeking spatial justice[M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.

    [14] DIRSUWEIT T. New urbanism, public space and spatial justice in Johannesburg: the case of 44 Stanley Ave[J]. Annales de géographie, 2009(1): 76-93.

    [15] KAYDEN J. Using and misusing law to design the public realm[J]. Regulating place: standards the shaping of urban America, 2005: 115-140.

    [16] RIGOLON A, NéMETH J. A QUality INdex of Parks for Youth (QUINPY): evaluating urban parks through geographic information systems[J]. Environment and planning b: urban analytics and city science, 2018, 45(2): 275-294.

    [17] KLINGMANN A. Brandscapes: architecture in the experience economy[M]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2007.

    [18] MILLER J. The passion of Michel Foucault[M]. London: Harper Collins, 1993.

    [19] SENNETT R. The fall of public man[M]. New York: W.W. Norton, 1992.

    [20] MARCUSE H. One-dimensional man: studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society[M]. Boston: Beacon Press, 1964.

    [21] SACCO P L, TARTARI M, FERILLI Guido, et al. Gentrification as space domestication. the high line art case[J]. Urban geography, 2019. 40(4): 529-554.

    [22] 刘彬, 陈忠暖. 权力、资本与空间:历史街区改造背景下的城市消费空间生产——以成都远洋太古里为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2018, 33(1): 75-80. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2016.26.

    [23] 许凯, Klaus SEMSROTH. “公共性”的没落到复兴——与欧洲城市公共空间对照下的中国城市公共空间[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2013(3): 61-69.

    [24] 潘忠党, 於红梅. 阈限性与城市空间的潜能——一个重新想象传播的维度[J]. 开放时代, 2015(3): 140-57.

    [25] NéMETH J. Defining a public: the management of privately owned public space[J]. Urban studies, 2009, 46(11): 2463-2490.

    [26] LANDMAN K. Evolving public space in South Africa: towards regenerative space in the post-apartheid city[M]. London: Routledge, 2018.

    [27] HAJER M A. In Search of new public domain-analysis and strategy[M]. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers, 2001.

    [28] WHYTE W H. The social life of small urban spaces[M]. New York: Project for Public Spaces, 1980.

    [29] 郭恩慈. 东亚城市空间生产[M]. 台北: 田园城市文化事业有限公司, 2011.

    [30] 莎伦·佐金. 裸城——原真性城市场所的生与死[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2015.

    [31] JACOBS J. The death and life of great American cities[M]. New York: Vintage, 1961.

    [32] HABERMAS J. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society[M]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1989.

    [33] NéMETH J, SCHMIDT S. Toward a methodology for measuring the security of publicly accessible spaces[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2007, 73(3): 283-297.


《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7801976