周航 李家斌 李渊 王峰 赵晨阳

Zhou Hang, Li Jiabin, Li Yuan, Wang Feng, Zhao Chenyang

关键词：公共交通可达性水平；国土空间规划；城市交通；土地利用；应用场景；伦敦；杭州

Keywords：Public Transport Accessibility Levels (PTALs); Spatial Planning; Urban Transportation; Land Use; Scenario Applications; London; Hangzhou

摘要：

随着我国城镇化进程进入“下半场”，精准投放公共交通资源以匹配城市用地空间增长将成为实现高质量发展的一条重要路径。伦敦长期以来将公共交通可达性水平（PTALs）技术贯穿于城市空间与交通发展中，系统建立了涵盖城市空间和交通规划及监测、民众查询等功能的应用体系，搭建了交通与土地利用协调发展的桥梁，共同支撑城市健康发展。本文首先总结了伦敦PTALs 技术的发展经验；其次，基于伦敦经验分析了我国城市引入该技术的必要性和适应性，提出构建面向市民查询和辅助政府决策的PTALs 技术应用框架体系；最后，文章以杭州为例，从支持规划编制、实施评估、运行监测等层面探索了PTALs技术在六大场景的应用，涉及交通、用地、人口等领域。PTALs 技术可测度公共交通服务的供给水平，能够成为公共交通与城市用地发展协调性的量化评估工具，未来在我国的国土空间规划编制与评估、城市体检以及“一张图”建设等工作中具有较好的应用前景。

Abstract：

The accurate investment of public transport resources to match the urban land and space growth will be an important path to achieve high-quality development in the second half of Chinese urbanization. For a long time, London has incorporated public transport accessibility levels (PTALs) technology into urban space and transportation development, and has systematically established an application system covering functions such as urban space or transportation planning and monitoring, and public inquiry. It builds a bridge for the coordinated development of transportation and land use, so that the two can jointly support the healthy development of the city. This paper firstly summarizes the PTALs development experience in London; then it analyzes the necessity and adaptability of PTALs technology in Chinese cities, and builds an application framework system for citizens’ inquiries and assisting government decision-making; finally, taking Hangzhou as an example, six scenarios are explored from supporting planning preparation, implementation evaluation, and operation monitoring, involving transport, land use, population and other fields. We believe that PTALs technology can measure the supply level of public transport services, and can also become a quantitative assessment tool for the coordination of public transport and urban land development. It has good application prospects in the preparation and evaluation of territorial spatial planning and “urban physical examination”.

周航，杭州市规划设计研究院，助理工程师。1282846133@qq.com

李家斌（通讯作者），杭州市规划设计研究院，高级工程师。516704343@qq.com

李渊，杭州市规划设计研究院，助理工程师。1845983785@qq.com

王峰，杭州市规划设计研究院，副总工程师，高级工程师。180902166@qq.com

赵晨阳，杭州市规划设计研究院，工程师。2402279037@qq.com

• [1] 中国共产党第十九届中央委员会. 中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议[R]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2021.

  [2] 中国共产党第十九届中央委员会, 国务院. 中共中央国务院关于建立国土空间规划体系并监督实施的若干意见[R]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2019.

  [3] 张天然, 朱春节. 伦敦公共交通可达性分析方法及应用[J]. 城市交通, 2019, 17(1): 70-76, 13.

  [4] 刘贤腾. 空间可达性研究综述[J]. 城市交通, 2007(6): 36-43.

  [5] 李渊, 王峰, 李家斌. 基于PTALs 的公共交通服务供给水平分析——以杭州为例[C] // 中国城市规划学会城市交通规划学术委员会. 交通治理与空间重塑——2020 年中国城市交通规划年会论文集. 中国城市规划设计研究院城市交通专业研究院, 2020.

  [6] YAN L. Public transport accessibility index: can they help discern issues of social equity?[EB/OL]. (2018-01-12)[2021-05-12]. https://leyankoh.com/2018/01/12/public-transport-accessibility-index-can-they-help-discernissues-of-social-equity/.

  [7] ABLEY S, HALDEN D. NZ Transport Agency research report 512: The New Zealand accessibility analysis methodology[R/OL]. (2013-03)[2021-09-14]. https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/research/reports/512/docs/512.pdf.

  [8] Newcastle Government. Greater Newcastle future transport plan[R]. Newcastle, 2018.

  [9] SHAH J, ADHVARYU B. Public transport accessibility levels for Ahmedabad, India[J]. Journal of public transportation, 2016, 19(3): 19-35.

  [10] SAGHAPOUR T, MORIDPOUR S, THOMPSON R G. Modeling access to public transport in urban areas: public transportation[J]. Journal of advanced transportation, 2016, 50(8): 1785-1801.

  [11] ADHVARYU B, CHOPDE A, DASHORA L. Mapping public transport accessibility levels (PTAL) in India and its applications: a case study of Surat[J]. Case studies on transport policy, 2019, 7(2): 293-300.

  [12] PAROLOTTO F, ARCURI F. Moscow stories episode 3: the hidden shape of public transport[EB/OL]. (2016-06-29)[2021-05-12]. http://www.michain.com/en/research/posts/moscow-stories-episode-3-the-hidden-shape-of-publictransport/.

  [13] 魏贺, 张晓东, 冯雅薇, 等. 大伦敦市长交通战略述评[J]. 道路交通与安全, 2018, 18(5): 53-64.

  [14] 田颖, 耿慧志. 英国空间规划体系各层级衔接问题探讨——以大伦敦地区规划实践为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2019, 34(2): 86-93. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2017.251.

  [15] Greater London Authority. The London Plan 2004: spatial development strategy for Greater London[R]. London: GLA, 2004.

  [16] Greater London Authority. The London Plan 2008: spatial development strategy for Greater London consolidated with alternations since 2004[R]. London: GLA, 2008.

  [17] Greater London Authority. The London Plan 2011: spatial development strategy for Greater London[R]. London: GLA, 2016.

  [18] Greater London Authority. The London Plan 2016: the spatial development strategy for London consolidated with alterations since 2011[R]. London: GLA, 2016.

  [19] Greater London Authority. The London Plan 2018: spatial development strategy for Greater London – draft for public consultation[R]. London: GLA, 2017.

  [20] Greater London Authority. The London Plan 2021: spatial development strategy for Greater London[R]. London: GLA, 2021.

  [21] Transport for London. Mayors transport strategy 2018[R]. London, 2018.

  [22] Greater London Authority. The London plan 2016: central activities zone supplementary planning guidance[R]. London: GLA, 2016.

  [23] Transport for London. Travel in London report 4[R]. London, 2011.

  [24] Transport for London. Reinstatement of Camberwell National Rail Station: strategic outline business case[R]. London, 2018.

  [25] Transport for London. Strategic cycling analysis[R]. London, 2018.

  [26] Transport for London. Assessing transport connectivity in London [R]. London, 2015.

  [27] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 城市综合交通体系规划标准GB/T51328-2018[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2019.

  
  

• 收起