周详 刘轩轩 孙泽仪

Zhou Xiang, Liu Xuanxuan, Sun Zeyi

关键词：数字足迹 ；应用场景 ；被动型与主动型 ；空间结构 ；服务体验

Keywords：Digital Footprint; Application Scenario; Passive Mode and Active Mode; Spatial Structure; Service Experience

摘要：

基于“数字化生存”的社会现实，文章指出 ：数字足迹等新型数据类型的应用范畴，在全球经济形态与信息交互技术不断耦合、共同演进的前提下正不断扩展。在明确将数字足迹划分为被动型与主动型两种应用类型的基础上，文章对数字足迹的发展历程与价值特征进行研判。研究发现 ：数字足迹的应用场景目前主要集中于七大研究领域，并开始呈现跨领域交叉与多学科融合的趋势。其中，城市领域的研究主要包括两种类型 ：一是以被动型数字足迹为主导的城市空间结构研究，二是以主动型数字足迹为主导的城市服务体验研究。前者主要包括城市交通、区域结构、人口流动、环境评价四方面内容，后者则主要涉及游憩服务、体验感知、功能协调三方面内容。在分析上述单一类型数字足迹应用局限的基础上，文章提出两种类型数字足迹的综合运用将成为未来城市研究一种重要发展趋势。笔者认为 ：通过对数字足迹的应用场景与创新前景进行分类解析，有助于提升城市空间研究的丰富性与生动性。

Abstract：

Based on the social reality of “being digital”, this paper points out that the application scope of digital footprint has been expanded under the premise of continuous coupling and co-evolving between the global economic form and information interaction technology. On the basis of categorizing digital footprint into passive and active application types, this paper studies the development course and value characteristics of digital footprint. The results show that the current application scenarios of digital footprints mainly focus on seven research fields, and illustrating the trend of cross-field overlapping and multidisciplinary integration. Among them, there are mainly two research types in the urban field: one is the research on urban spatial structure led by passive digital footprint; the other is the research on urban service experience led by active digital footprint. The former includes urban transportation, regional structure, population flow and environmental evaluation, while the latter involves recreational service, experience perception and function coordination. Based on the analysis of the limitations of utilizing the single type of digital footprint, it is proposed that the comprehensive application of the two types of digital footprint will become an important trend of urban research in the future. The authors argue that classifying and analyzing the application scenarios and innovation prospects of digital footprint will help to improve the richness and vitality of urban space research.

周详（通信作者），博士，东南大学建筑学院，副教授。12700657@qq.com

刘轩轩，东南大学建筑学院，研究助理

孙泽仪，东南大学建筑学院，研究助理

• [1] NEGROPONTE N. Being digital[M]. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.

  [2] PINE B J, GILMORE J H. The experience economy[M]. Brighton: Harvard Business Review Press, 2011.

  [3] 孙智中 , 张晨 . 基于厚数据的信息分析：内涵与模式 [J]. 情报资料工作 , 2020, 41(3): 69-75.

  [4] 刘畅 . 网人合一：从 Web1.0 到 Web3.0 之路 [J]. 河南社会科学 , 2008（2）:137-140.

  [5] SALAS-OLMEDO M H, MOYA-GóMEZ B, GARCíA-PALOMARES J C, et al. Tourists’digital footprint in cities: comparing big data sources[J]. Tourism management, 2018, 66:13-25.

  [6] OSBORNE N, CONNELLY L. Managing your digital footprint[J]. ALISS quarterly, 2015, 11: 22-26.

  [7] GIRARDIN F, CALABRESE F, FIORE F D, et al. Digital footprinting: uncovering tourists with user-generated content[J]. IEEE pervasive computing, 2009, 7(4): 36-43.

  [8] GIRARDIN F. Catching the world’s eyes[M] // OFFENHUBER D, RATTI C. eds. Decoding the city: urbanism in the age of big data[M]. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag AG, 2014.

  [9] ROSE G, WILLIS A. Seeing the smart city on Twitter: colour and the affective territories of becoming smart[J]. Environment and planning d: society and space, 2018, 37(3): 411-427.

  [10] STOCK K. Mining location from social media: a systematic review[J]. Computers, environment and urban systems, 2018, 71(5): 209-240.

  [11] DOURISH P. Re-space-ing place[C] // Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2006: 299-308.

  [12] KONG C, GAO M, XU C, et al. Entity matching across multiple heterogeneous data sources[C] // International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 2016: 133-146.

  [13] ARYA V, SETHI D, PAUL J. Does digital footprint act as a digital asset? enhancing brand experience through remarketing[J]. International journal of information management, 2019, 49: 142-156.

  [14] OENDER I, KOERBITZ W, HUBMANN-HAIDVOGEL A. Tracing tourists by their digital footprints: the case of Austria[J]. Journal of travel research, 2016, 55(5): 566-573.

  [15] TU W, LI Q, FANG Z, et al. Optimizing the locations of electric taxi charging stations: a spatial-temporal demand coverage approach[J]. Transportation research part c, 2016, 65: 172-189.

  [16] TU W, CAO R, YUE Y, et al. Spatial variations in urban public ridership derived from GPS trajectories and smart card data[J]. Journal of transport geography, 2018, 69: 45-57.

  [17] LOUAIL T, LENORMAND M, CANTU ROS O, et al. From mobile phone data to the spatial structure of cities[J]. Scientific reports, 2014, 4(1): 1-14.

  [18] ZHANG Y, MARSHALL S, CAO M, et al. Discovering the evolution of urban structure using smart card data: the case of London[J]. Cities, 2021, 112(3): 103-157.

  [19] ZHOU Y, FANG Z, THILL J C, et al. Functionally critical locations in urban transportation network: identification and space-time analysis using trajectories[J]. Computers, environment and urban systems, 2015, 52: 34-47

  [20] ZENG C, YANG L, DONG J. Management of urban land expansion China through intensity assessment: a big data perspective[J]. Journal cleaner production, 2017, 153: 637-647.

  [21] 钟炜菁 , 王德 . 基于居民行为周期特征的城市空间研究 [J]. 地理科学进展 , 2018, 37(8): 98-110.

  [22] YABE T, TSUBOUCHI K, SEKIMOTO Y. City flow fragility: measuring fragility of people flow in cities to disasters using GPS data collected from smartphones[J]. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive mobile wearable ubiquitous technologies, 2017, 1(3): 1-17.

  [23] 谢栋灿 , 王德 , 钟炜菁 , 等 . 上海市建成环境的评价与分析 ：基于手机信令数据的探索 [J]. 城市规划 , 2018, 42(10): 103-114, 126.

  [24] HE Q, HE W, SONG Y, et al. The impact of urban growth patterns urban vitality in newly built-up areas based on an association rules analysis using geographical‘big data’[J]. Land use policy, 2018, 78: 726-738.

  [25] 李渊 , 郑伟民 , 王德 . 景区旅游者空间行为研究综述 [J]. 旅游学刊 , 2018, 33(4): 103-112.

  [26] VU H, LI G, LAW R, et al. Exploring the travel behaviors of inbound tourists to Hong Kong using geotagged photos[J]. Tourism management, 2015, 46: 222-232.

  [27] WALDEN-SCHREINER C, LEUNG Y, TATEOSIAN L. Digital footprints: incorporating crowdsourced geographic information for protected area management[J]. Applied geography, 2018, 90: 44-54.

  [28] 梁保尔 , 潘植强 . 基于旅游数字足迹的目的地关注度与共现效应研究——以上海历史街区为例 [J]. 旅游学刊 , 2015, 30(7): 80-90.

  [29] 唐佳薇 . 基于旅游照片的湖南省国家森林公园游客景观偏好研究 [D]. 湖南 : 中南林业科技大学 , 2018.

  [30] 李渊 , 高小涵 , 黄竞雄 , 等 . 基于摄影照片与眼动实验的旅游者视觉行为分析——以厦门大学为例 [J]. 旅游学刊 , 2020, 35(9): 41-52.

  [31] 邓宁 , 刘耀芳 , 牛宇 , 等 . 不同来源地旅游者对北京目的地形象感知差异——基于深度学习的 Flickr 图片分析 [J]. 资源科学 , 2019, 41(3): 416-429.

  [32] 张琳 , 朱文一 . 抖音短视频空间意象初探——以三处重庆网红打卡地为例 [J]. 城市设计 , 2020, 1: 36-45.

  [33] 朱钟炜 . 基于社交媒体数据的城市绿地景观满意度评价方法 [D]. 北京 : 北京大学 , 2020.

  [34] 刘震 , 戴泽钒 , 楼嘉军 , 等 . 基于数字足迹的城市游憩行为时空特征研究——以上海为例 [J]. 世界地理研究 , 2019, 28(5): 95-105.

  [35] TóTH G, WACHS J, DI CLEMENTE R. et al. Inequality is rising where social network segregation interacts with urban topology[J]. Nature communications, 2021, 12(1): 1-9.

  [36] 秦萧 , 甄峰 , 朱寿佳 , 等 . 基于网络口碑度的南京城区餐饮业空间分布格局研究——以大众点评网为例 [J]. 地理科学 , 2014, 34(7): 810-817.

  [37] 潘碧麟 , 王江浩 , 葛咏 , 等 . 基于微博签到数据的成渝城市群空间结构及其城际人口流动研究 [J]. 地球信息科学学报 , 2019, 21(1): 68-76.

  [38] CALABRESE F, FERRARI L, BLONDEL V. Urban sensing using mobile phone network data: a survey of research[J]. ACM computing surveys, 2014, 47(2): 1-20.

  [39] GRAHAM M, ZOOK M. Augmented realities and uneven geographies: exploring the geolinguistic contours of the web[J]. Environment & planning a, 2013, 45(1): 77-99.

  [40] 陈圆圆 . 上海市公共活动中心空间绩效及影响因素研究 [J]. 上海国土资源 , 2019, 40(3): 13-19.

  [41] 陈筝 , 刘颂 . 基于可穿戴传感器的实时环境情绪感受评价 [J]. 中国园林 , 2018, 34(3): 12-17.

  
  

  
  

  
  

• 收起